None
EN
Revolution Wind not a cure-all
['Mary Ann Turner', 'Ct Mirror', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow', 'Class', 'Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus', 'Display Inline', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar', 'Where Img', 'Height Auto Max-Width', 'Vertical-Align Bottom .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar']
CT Mirror
Wind and solar have their place, but they are intermittent sources — the sun doesn’t always shine, and the wind doesn’t always blow.
Third, the idea that offshore wind projects like Revolution Wind are some sort of cure-all ignores their very real detriments:Skyrocketing costs – Offshore wind is among the most expensive forms of electricity.
Taxpayer handouts – Billions of federal and state tax dollars are funneled into wind power projects that cannot stand on their own.
Battery hazards – To “store” unreliable wind power, enormous lithium battery banks are needed.
These aren’t minor issues — they’re why many investors and European countries that went all-in on offshore wind are now facing financial losses and energy instability.
['cureall'
'offshore'
'president'
'revolution'
'energy'
'nuclear'
'reliable'
'opinion'
'trump'
'projects'
'power'
'jobs'
'wind']