Compelling private entities to host disputed messages they disagree with––NetChoice calls Colorado’s statements “state-compelled opinions”––raises profound First Amendment problems, but that’s what the statute in Weiser seemingly does. NetChoice emphasizes that“the impact of social media” on young users is the subject of ongoing and vigorous debate, in addition to active litigation. Academics, policymakers, thought leaders, and parents all disagree on various issues regarding social media—from what websites qualify as “social media” to the precise balance of benefits and purported drawbacks they offer users. States may freely conduct educational campaigns—ones without platforms’ conscripted aid—to provide parents and minors with facts to make informed decisions about social media usage. Most obviously, it could inform the women itself with a public-information campaign.” The Court added that “California cannot co-opt the licensed facilities to deliver its message for it.” Neither can Colorado now do the same with social media platforms.