None
EN
Data should be reviewed
['Ragnar', 'Groot Koerkamp']
home on CuriousCoding
Experiments and their analysis should be reproducible, and all data/figures in a paper should be reviewable. Pipelines (e.g. snakemake files) to generated them should be attached to the paper. I’ve asked for automated scripts to reproduce test data on 3+ github repositories now, and got a satisfactory answer zero times: