The virtual object we call Canada doesn't exist in reality: it's a pawn we invent in our language to succinctly refer to a bunch of correlated physical objects like territories, accents, and passports, and to lots of other virtual objects like laws and behaviors. The point is not to provide a novel understanding of language, but to show that the mere use of a language, any language, comes with batteries included and hard-wired, whether we like it or not. The real "Fundamental Framing of Human Language" might be more sophisticated, more complex, or very different from the one I proposed above, but some framing must be there, because of the very nature of human language.