It doesn't show that AI art is morally acceptable (the Subsurface Claim), nor does it show the opposite: a flawed argument doesn't show anything. If we use the full picture (the one before this last one), it is evident that any claim that is supported or criticized by an argument needs to be carefully attributed to the right groups of people, and any allegation of contradictions needs to prove that it is indeed a single group of people making both contradicting claims. How many people are against AI art in absolute moral terms, and how many are against AI art in the context of the current capitalistic forces that seem prone to squashing the already-precarious livelihood of human artists?