None
EN
Will poor American neighbourhoods be better served if doctors can attend tuition-free medical schools?
['Michael Cook', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow', 'Class', 'Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus', 'Display Inline', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar', 'Where Img', 'Height Auto Max-Width', 'Vertical-Align Bottom .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar', 'Vertical-Align Middle .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar Is .Alignleft .Alignright']
BioEdge
“Unfortunately, on training primary care physicians or sending graduates to underserved areas, tuition-free medical school gets an F.” The students’ career choices are “ not meaningfully different from any other top-tier medical school without a tuition-free policy: The vast majority of students steer toward the usual-suspect specialties and health systems.” They propose ideas like forgiving student loans for young doctors who “enter primary care, pediatrics, or psychiatry, or who work in underserved urban or rural communities”.