None
EN
How the coronavirus split science in two
['.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow', 'Class', 'Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus', 'Display Inline', 'Sourceurl Https', 'Www.Politico.Eu Wp-Content Plugins Co-Authors-Plus Build Blocks Block-Coauthors Style-Index.Css', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar', 'Where Img', 'Height Auto Max-Width', 'Vertical-Align Bottom .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar']
News RSS Feed
The effect, according to some experts, has been a stifling of the scientific debate that risks impeding — rather than facilitating — progress, and the extension of the polarized political climate into the realm of public health. “One of the things I haven't liked is people kind of shouting at each other over face masks or airborne particles; or whether immunity wanes, or doesn't; or whether we should vaccinate children,” said Fiona Fox, director of the U.K.-based Science Media Centre, which helps connect journalists to credible experts.