As everybody still following the Supreme Court knows, the court recently ruled 6-3 in the case of 303 Creative v. Elenis that a website designer with religious beliefs against same-sex marriage had the First Amendment right to turn down same-sex couples if they asked the designer to make wedding websites for them. It turns out that no same-sex couple filed a complaint against a wedding website designer, and no actual same-sex couple were parties to the case. By the same token, would anyone see any real dissent since all nine justices seem to agree that any designer working for a same-sex couple is free to put biblical quotations on a wedding website saying their marriage is invalid?