It says that the section violates the Supreme Court’s 2015 Shreya Singhal judgment, which ruled that online content can only be blocked by a court order or under the structured process of Section 69A of the IT Act. The platform also cited the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India case, arguing that SAHYOG operates outside the legal framework of Section 69A of the IT Act and creates a parallel system without those protections, making it legally questionable. The microblogging platform has been involved in several legal disputes with the Indian government concerning content regulation and platform governance.