These are very much like the petitioner's argument or the government's argument, is that an algorithm that the social media company creates in order to make recommendations of other content for users to view should they so choose, because in this case we're talking about Google's YouTube, so we're talking about videos being recommended through their algorithms, that targeted recommendation is not third party content. Is it part of the challenge of this is that it's hard to disentangle the recommendation from the content itself> particularly in this case, because presumably if this was involve different content, Google wouldn't be... You wouldn't have much of a claim under JASTA if this was some other content and not ISIS propaganda.