Although the charge-sheet described the men as “activists of a particular political organisation,” the Court focused only on their conduct, making it clear that political description cannot replace legal proof. After preparing the statement, I merely affixed my signature on the paper as shown by them without reading the statement. I was never aware that the petitioner’s name was included.”Taking this on record, the Supreme Court held, “Suffice it to record on perusal of the above statement that there is much more than what meets the eyes. With 141 witnesses to be examined and the trial expected to run long, the Supreme Court reinforced that no political description or assumption can justify denying liberty where evidence does not establish misuse of bail. Case Title: Abhimanue & Ors vs State of KeralaBench: Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George MasihDate of Judgment: September 22, 2025