He attributed this shift to two key factors: the unintended consequences of meritocracy and a growing sense of socio-economic precariousness. Fadli argued that while meritocracy is designed to reward talent and hard work over connections, it can—when taken to an extreme—mask existing inequalities. Fadli warned that when meritocracy becomes a belief system rather than a policy tool, it can result in those who are left behind being wrongly blamed for their struggles, perceived as undeserving or simply lacking effort. Citing the realities faced by low- and middle-income citizens, Fadli highlighted that many Singaporeans live with a sense of constant uncertainty. Returning to the broader theme of dignity, Fadli argued that a society where every citizen feels respected and valued will naturally cultivate greater public-spiritedness.