None
EN
Comment on ‘The climate conversation will define us’ by David Rhodes
['Alecia Greenfield', '.Pp-Multiple-Authors-Boxes-Wrapper.Pp-Multiple-Authors-Layout-Boxed.Boxed-Archive.Multiple-Authors-Target-Shortcode .Pp-Author-Boxes-Avatar Img', 'Width', 'Important', 'Height', 'Border-Style', 'None', 'Border-Radius', '.Pp-Multiple-Authors-Boxes-Wrapper.Pp-Multiple-Authors-Layout-Boxed.Boxed-Archive.Multiple-Authors-Target-Shortcode .Pp-Author-Boxes-Name A', 'Color']
Comments for Anglican Journal
Reflections on a disappointing climate conference—and a commitment of loveI’ve been involved in the Anglican church’s response to the climate crisis for a few years now.
At one point, early on, I proudly told my teenage daughter Hannah that I had said no to an invitation to sit on my diocese’s climate response committee.
Globally, Indigenous peoples are most impacted by climate change and are most often protectors of the land.
The climate conversation will define us and the church needs to faithfully engage.
She is also chair of the diocese of New Westminster’s Climate Response Committee and a member of the ecclesiastical province of British Columbia’s Social Eco-Justice Committee.
['love'
'conference'
'indigenous'
'define'
'climate'
'screen'
'cop26'
'committee'
'conversation'
'church'
'response'
'creation']