None
HU
Six Months Later: What Their Response on ME/CFS Tells Us About the Cochrane Collaboration
['Hilda Bastian', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow', 'Class', 'Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus', 'Display Inline', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar', 'Where Img', 'Height Auto Max-Width', 'Vertical-Align Bottom .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar', 'Vertical-Align Middle .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar Is .Alignleft .Alignright']
Absolutely Maybe
Cochrane reviews are published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Updating is central to what makes a Cochrane review a Cochrane review.
Here’s how the Cochrane website currently answers the question, “Why are Cochrane reviews reliable?”:“Cochrane reviews are internationally recognised as the highest standard in evidence-based health care.
There were a few stragglers later that year, but since 2020, no Cochrane review has been withdrawn.
I have a talk page that I began for responding to questions about the Cochrane ME/CFS project.
['tells'
'mecfs'
'outofdate'
'iag'
'update'
'2024'
'response'
'evidence'
'later'
'cochrane'
'collaboration'
'reviews'
'months'
'editorial'
'review']