In reply to <a href="https://betakit.com/logojoy-raises-900000-seed-round-to-stay-ahead-of-design-automation-space/#comment-4037">Bobby Lee</a>. Spare me your ignorance. My design clients pay around $1,500 for a logo and what they receive is a unique design that will help them stand out. Anyone who thinks a $50 stock logo will benefit their business is not someone who would hire me anyway, and not someone who I'd want to work with. I just tested out LogoJoy. I searched for dental logos, and the results were laughable. Completely generic, not relevant, unmemorable, and lacking any unique elements. Most of the results were just a cheesy font inside a circle or rectangle. Tell me how that is appropriate for any brand wanting to stand out. A logo is often times the first thing folks see when introduced to a company. When a consumer is purchasing a product or service and there are 3 similar offerings, the business who's invested properly in their brand identity will have an advantage over those who did not. I understand that not everyone can afford more costly custom design, though there are cheaper designers who can offer far superior results than what LogoJoy is offering. There is nothing wrong with using a stock logo, though when they look as poor as those on LogoJoy, it's mind boggling to me that anyone would find those designs suitable. So no, I'm not scared about LogoJoy or any cheap crowdsource based design service taking work away from me. What I do think however, is these sites cheapen design and offer no real value to the purchaser. If you're finding quality logos on LogoJoy, I'd love to see them.