The Bench emphasised that Samim is a practising advocate and not a layperson, making the alleged conduct particularly serious. The Court said Samim should appear before the Single Judge concerned, seek pardon and give an undertaking that such conduct would never be repeated. The Court noted that Samim regularly practises before it and has appeared before the concerned judges. Expressing concern that the High Court should not be seen as remaining silent when such conduct occurs, the Court remarked, “Our HC advocate! At the conclusion of the hearing, the Bench directed Samim to approach the concerned judge during the livestreamed proceedings and tender an apology.