European operators have spent the past two years building sovereign AI infrastructure at a pace few predicted, backed by neocloud capital, new hyperscaler EU regions, and national compute programs. Crucially, that obligation doesn’t stop at whoever built the AI system. The Act separates providers, who build AI systems, from deployers, who put them into operational use, and deployer obligations attach independently of authorship. Still, the standard that having a process isn’t the same as having a working, accountable one is exactly what AI governability enforcement will look like once AI systems are the ones doing the reporting. Can you trace what your AI systems are doing before failures cascade, not after?