None
EN
'Surveillance pricing' is legal gouging. California legislators don't seem to care
['Anita Chabria Is A California Columnist For The Los Angeles Times', 'Based In Sacramento. Before Joining The Times', 'She Worked For The Sacramento Bee As A Member Of Its Statewide Investigative Team', 'Previously Covered Criminal Justice', 'City Hall. Follow Her On Bluesky At Anitachabria.Bsky.Social', 'On X At']
News from California, across the nation and world - Los Angeles Times
Some companies are purchasing deep data to figure out the maximum price that they could charge each unwitting consumer.
AdvertisementWard is trying to outlaw surveillance pricing in California with his AB 2564, which seems like a no-brainer if you actually care about affordability and your constituents.
Right now, most surveillance pricing is relying on established data collection.
Which makes regulating surveillance pricing now all the more important.
White, the economist, points out that companies are spending millions to implement surveillance pricing, and they aren’t doing it so they can slash prices and lose money.