The Plaintiff held the holster with his right hand, with his hand positioned over the muzzle end of the holster. This is a firearm design defect case. However, Georgia courts have acknowledged that, in order to resolve a design defect case, "the court is called upon to supply the standard for defectiveness." …[T]he Defendant argues that the Plaintiff's design defect claims amount to a de facto ban of purchasing handguns without an external safety, which runs antithetical to the Second Amendment…. And, in that case, the Defendant might plausibly assert that the Plaintiff's design defect claims infringe on the Second Amendment.