None
EN
Kent Quinlan v Shell: Court Fast-Tracks Evidence After Terminal Cancer Diagnosis
['Walt Beyer', 'Is Sabotaging Our Life', 'Shell Energy Broadband Service Is Appalling', 'Far The Worst Broadband Provider Ever', 'Extremely Slow Shell Broadband']
Royal Dutch Shell Plc .com
Mr Quinlan’s substantive allegations remain contested and have not been proved in court.
According to that report, Cooper J granted an application for Mr Quinlan to give evidence, with the evidence to be taken in closed court and audio-video recorded.
If Mr Quinlan dies before trial, the recording is intended to be played publicly at the trial.
The Court also considered Shell’s requests concerning unredacted disclosure and Mr Quinlan’s own disclosure obligations.
The responsible conclusion at this stage is therefore straightforward: Mr Quinlan obtained limited additional disclosure, Shell succeeded in resisting broader relief, and the central allegations remain unresolved.