A recent Delaware Court of Chancery opinion is required reading for those interested in the important distinction between corporate acts that are void as compared to voidable. In a 100-plus page decision in connection with approving a class action settlement and attorneys’ fees, the Court of Chancery engages in a deep doctrinal dive and scholarly analysis into the void versus voidable distinction in corporate acts. In the process the court provides a mini treatise on the impact of the recent Delaware Supreme Court decision in Moelis on various aspects of Delaware law and the public policy implications of the new rule for the void v. voidable distinction. In Dollens v. Goosehead Insurance, Inc., C.A. June 30, 2026), the court provides noteworthy guidance on the wide-ranging impact of the Delaware Supreme Court decision in W. Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. Moelis & Co., 2026 WL 184868 (Del.