None
EN
(LETTERS) Antifeminist rhetoric and global warming beneficiaries
['Oil City Staff', '.Wp-Block-Comment-Author-Name Box-Sizing Border-Box', '.Wp-Block-Post-Author Box-Sizing Border-Box Display Flex Flex-Wrap Wrap .Wp-Block-Post-Author__Byline Font-Size Margin-Bottom Margin-Top Width', '.Wp-Block-Post-Author__Avatar Margin-Right .Wp-Block-Post-Author__Bio Font-Size Margin-Bottom .Wp-Block-Post-Author__Content Flex-Basis Flex-Grow .Wp-Block-Post-Author__Name Margin', '.Wp-Block-Post-Author-Biography Box-Sizing Border-Box', '.Wp-Block-Post-Author-Name Box-Sizing Border-Box', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow', 'Class', 'Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus', 'Display Inline']
Oil City News
This strategy is commonly utilized by the conservative right to prop up their agenda.
The radical right has taken to using antifeminist rhetoric to “other” individuals outside their circles.
Radical right wing groups use antifeminist rhetoric to tear down people choosing not to live in ways they deem acceptable.
They make false statements like “feminism is the biggest lie we have been sold” or “feminism is openly hostile to conservative women.”
I think there is another explanation: Nobody stands to gain more from accelerated global warming than Russia.