He argued that while the platform's anonymity policy makes it difficult to determine who edits its content,after programmer Virgil Griffith createdThe tool attributed edits to the"Wikipedia is already compromised. That's clear," he said. Sanger argued thatbecause large language models increasingly rely on its content as a reference source when answering factual queries.To address the problems, he proposed sweeping reforms, including public identities for senior functionaries, due-process protections in disciplinary cases, public article ratings, and elected officials responsible for setting Wikipedia policy.Sanger is not the only prominent critic of Wikipedia. Conservative commentators have long accused Wikipedia, which relies on donations, of betraying its promise of neutrality on contentious topics. Elon Musk mocked the platform as "Wokipedia" and once offered $1 billion if it agreed to rename itself "Dickipedia" for a year.Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said in 2024 that Wikipedia almost always reflects a Western-centric interpretation of events and contains outright fabrications.