The student had appeared for the MBBS Supplementary Examination in Human Anatomy-II on December 4, 2025. The student approached the High Court through Advocate W V B Shravan, challenging the university's decision. The counsel argued that the university punished him but never supplied the allegedly seized material, the Special Observer’s report relied upon to hold him guilty. The High Court, however, found that the university had concluded that the student was guilty without furnishing the material on which the finding was based. The High Court set aside the university's disqualification order and directed the authorities to reconsider the matter.