This verdict is important because it shows that fame, influence and professional accomplishment cannot become shields against accountability. As the founder-editor of Tehelka, which is reputed for exposing wrongdoing among the powerful, he occupied a position of considerable influence and public trust. The high court, which overturned his 2021 acquittal, through its judgment enhanced people’s trust in the judiciary. Unfortunately, Tejpal, who demanded accountability from governments and public institutions, himself failed to meet the standards that he set out for others. While Tejpal retains his constitutional right to challenge his conviction before the Supreme Court, the high court verdict — unless overturned by an appeal — stands as a powerful reminder that reputation cannot substitute for character and influence cannot confer immunity.