The High Court had earlier overturned his acquittal by the Trial Court and found him guilty of rape and sexual harassment under the Indian Penal Code (IPC). To put things in perspective, the Division Bench then envisages in para 3 while elaborating on the facts of the case that, “Factual Overview & Allegations:3.1. Seeking professional help is termed by the Trial Court as a possibility of doctoring of events or adding of incidents. The Bombay High Court convicted former Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal, sentenced him to 10 years’ imprisonment, and imposed a fine exceeding ₹10 lakh in the 2013 rape case. Can Tarun Tejpal challenge the High Court judgment?