The DSS told the court that the alleged offences contravened provisions of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022. The prosecution said the alleged action violated Section 13 of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022. The charge stated that the alleged offence was contrary to and punishable under Section 25 of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022. According to the DSS, the alleged act contravened Section 26 of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022. The prosecution said the alleged offence is punishable under Section 18 of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.)