None
EN
Inside Paul O’Sullivan’s four meetings with Idac officials
['Setumo Stone', 'Please Enter Your Name Here', 'Root', '--Ppa-Color-Scheme', '--Ppa-Color-Scheme-Active', 'Sourceurl Multiple-Authors-Widget-Css-Inline-Css', '.Pp-Multiple-Authors-Boxes-Wrapper.Pp-Multiple-Authors-Layout-Inline.Multiple-Authors-Target-The-Content .Pp-Author-Boxes-Avatar Img', 'Width', 'Important', 'Height']
Sunday World
The correspondence states that the matter “fizzled out” because the informant “could not provide substantial corroborative evidence” and later “went to ground”.
According to the correspondence, O’Sullivan’s attorneys served a subpoena duces tecum on Idac “to obtain information” about the bags.
“It turned out it wasn’t, so I got it directly from Robert McBride and submitted it as evidence,” the correspondence states.
Alleged corruption by police officials in MpumalangaThe fourth engagement concerned a Section 27 complaint lodged in November 2025 involving alleged corruption by police officials in Mpumalanga.
The correspondence states that Idac referred the matter to the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation.