“Plaintiffs’ standing theory amounts to little more than the assertion that they are consumers who watch television and go to the movies, and therefore a merger between entertainment companies would injure them,” the judge wrote. But the injury was “not suffered in the same way by all five of the plaintiffs,” the judge wrote. Watch on DeadlineMartínez-Olguín also is presiding over the separate antitrust cases challenging the merger brought by state attorneys general and the Writers Guild of America. The consumer lawsuit was filed in April, before the state AG lawsuit. The judge held a hearing in the case earlier this month, but denied the plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction.