None
RU
Stockist/Dealer Discounts Are Not Commission Under Section 194H: ITAT Mumbai
['Author Info', 'Name', 'Qualification', 'Company', 'Location', 'Articles Published', 'View Full Profile', 'More Ca Sandeep Kanoi', 'August']
taxguruin
AdvertisementDCIT Vs Wockhardt Limited (ITAT Mumbai) The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, decided the Revenue’s appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] for Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17.
The appeal arose from an order passed by the Income-tax Officer (TDS) under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
A survey under Section 133A(2A) was conducted at the assessee’s premises on 14.02.2017 to verify compliance with the TDS provisions contained in Chapter XVII-B of the Act.
During the survey, certain discrepancies were noticed, lead...