None
RU
Madras HC Quashes Non-Speaking Order Rejecting Stay Under Section 220(6)
['Author Info', 'Name', 'Qualification', 'Company', 'Location', 'Articles Published', 'View Full Profile', 'More Ca Sandeep Kanoi', 'August']
taxguruin
AdvertisementMasila Vs DCIT (Madras High Court) The writ petition was filed seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus to quash the respondent’s order dated 01.03.2022, which rejected the petitioner’s application dated 25.02.2022 seeking stay of demand under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and to direct the respondent to reconsider the application by passing a reasoned order.
The petitioner, a Paediatrics Therapist and Assistant Behaviour Analyst, filed the return of income for Assessment Year 2018-2019 on 05.10.2018, which was revised on 30.03.2019.
According to the petitioner, the ...