Gonda testified that this exchange took place in person …. The District Court found that Duering harassed Gonda, and did not err in restraining him from harassing her further…. [Duering also argues] that the District Court was improperly biased against Duering because of Duering's views on COVID vaccines. The District Court did not err in concluding that Duering had no legitimate purpose in contacting Gonda. Nothing in the record suggests any improper bias by the District Court….