None
RU
Mumbai ITAT: Builder’s Statement Alone Cannot Justify On-Money Addition
['Author Info', 'Name', 'Qualification', 'Company', 'Location', 'Articles Published', 'View Full Profile', 'More Ca Vijayakumar Shetty', 'August']
taxguruin
AdvertisementVikas Kailashchandra Gupta Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT: No Addition for Alleged On-Money Solely on Builder’s Statement Without Corroborative Evidence The Mumbai ITAT deleted an addition of ₹7.24 lakh made in the hands of a flat purchaser, holding that an alleged on-money payment cannot be taxed merely on the basis of a builder’s statement recorded during a search and documents seized from the builder, in the absence of any independent corroborative evidence against the purchaser.
The assessee had jointly purchased a flat in the Cosmos Group’s “Horizon TwiliteR...