Ammar emphasized that Salam is failing to differentiate between the occupying forces in Lebanon and the Resistance that stands in defense of the nation. This claim led to a swift response from the Prime Minister, marked by the issuance of a statement reiterating familiar rhetoric. Regrettably, the Prime Minister seems to have opted for a position of inaction, seemingly failing to differentiate between those violating sovereignty by occupying land and those defending it. Can the Prime Minister outline a single national benefit obtained through the direct negotiation process for Lebanon, other than delays, increased attacks, and further concessions? It would have been more appropriate for the Prime Minister to address these questions directly rather than evading them through a speech filled with accusations.