ABOUT THIS SERIES: This is the third of a three-part series exploring the local impact of the NCAA's new five-for-five rule. ADVERTISEMENTAdditionally, the court isn't enjoining operation of the transfer rules, clarifying that it is also not enjoining the age-based portion of the new eligibility rule. For the most part, local coaches appear to have embraced the five-for-five rule to the point of structuring their rosters in accordance to its framework. Those graduates received none of the benefits of the five-for-five rule, nor did they receive an extra COVID year, so where should the line be drawn? After years of eligibility confusion, the five-for-five rule was intended to provide some semblance of certainty.