A sole practitioner from Norwich who compared himself to Andrew Malkinson and the Post Office subpostmasters has lost his appeal against a £3,500 fine for anti-money laundering (AML) failures. Mr Wiley said “this mattered” because “compliance under the MLRs depended upon the size and nature of the business”. Mr Wiley, the SRA said, had simply “got it wrong”. The SDT found Mr Wiley’s conduct in relation to the FWRA did not meet the standard under the MLRs. The tribunal dismissed Mr Wiley’s appeal and ordered him this time to pay costs of £12,300.