Hyderabad: The Telangana High Court has held that parties which have voluntarily agreed to resolve disputes through arbitration cannot subsequently invoke the writ jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution to challenge the very process they had contractually accepted. Clause 39 provided that "any dispute" arising between the parties would be resolved through arbitration in accordance with the rules of the Indian Council of Arbitration. HMDA later opposed the initiation of arbitration, contending that subsequent changes in the consortium's shareholding, proceedings under the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP), and transfer of shares without prior approval rendered the arbitration proceedings untenable. Aggrieved by those communications, HMDA and HGCL approached the High Court. Rejecting the challenge, the division bench observed that parties who have consciously entered into an arbitration agreement cannot later contend that arbitration is being imposed upon them.