None
RU
P&H HC Quashes Premature Retirement Based on Unsubstantiated Adverse ACRs
['Author Info', 'Name', 'Qualification', 'Company', 'Location', 'Articles Published', 'View Full Profile', 'More Ca Sandeep Kanoi', 'August']
taxguruin
AdvertisementRam Vs State of Haryana and others (Punjab and Haryana High Court) The appellant challenged the judgment of the learned Single Judge dismissing his writ petition, which had sought quashing of the departmental inquiry report, disciplinary punishment, adverse Annual Confidential Report (ACR) remarks, rejection of his representations, and the order retiring him at the age of 55 years, along with consequential service benefits including retention in service up to the age of superannuation and promotional benefits.
The appellant had joined the Haryana Police as a Constable on 25.11.1987, was promot...