None
EN
Why more context can make your coding agents worse
['.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow', 'Class', 'Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus', 'Display Inline', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar', 'Where Img', 'Height Auto Max-Width', 'Vertical-Align Bottom .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar', 'Vertical-Align Middle .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar Is .Alignleft .Alignright', 'Display Table .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar.Aligncenter Display Table Margin-Inline Auto']
How I use AI to boost productivity and revenue | CIO
This results in context drift: work that’s confidently built on the wrong basis and token inefficient.
When the context is scoped to the task, the agent builds against the real target instead of reasoning over things that don’t apply.
Make scoping automaticRelying on developers to handpick the right context for every task doesn’t scale, and it makes the quality of an agent’s work reliant on what someone remembered to include.
Connecting the knowledge graph to your agents lets the relevant context flow automatically, scoped to each task.
What this means for leadersThe instinct is to invest in more capable agents, but the higher return (namely, more accurate outputs and fewer tokens spent) is often in the context you feed the agents you already have.