• Deception of “Unity”: In Nagaland, politicians often justify defection or joining the ruling fold under the banner of “unanimity for the Naga peace process.” Without an active opposition party that offers an alternative vision for governance, political discourse stagnates, leaving citizens without meaningful choices. — Aristotle, PoliticsConclusion: In Nagaland, replacing democratic opposition with political consensus often fails to achieve genuine peace or meaningful progress. As classical philosophy notes, eliminating checks and balances can undermine democratic institutions, distancing leaders from the people they serve. This shift can also create opportunities for plutocracy and oligarchy, endangering the core values of equality that many cherish.