As has been widely reported, two of the country’s most influential law schools have adopted markedly different approaches to generative artificial intelligence. It recognizes that AI is becoming part of legal practice and that law schools must prepare students to use it responsibly. Instead of asking whether students used AI, faculty should ask whether an assignment still demonstrates what they want to know about the student’s knowledge. That ultimately is what law schools should be measuring. The more important question is whether law schools will continue debating how students should use AI or begin reconsidering what a law degree is intended to certify.