The GPS monitoring requirement immediately became the central issue in the hearing, prompting the accused to confer with Cleary before the defense responded. Cleary told the court she found the prosecution’s proposed conditions otherwise reasonable but asked Judge Robert Hawk to strike the GPS requirement. She argued that imposing GPS monitoring risked undermining the progress he had made by creating unnecessary obstacles to maintaining employment. Following additional requests from both the accused and Cleary, Judge Hawk modified the order in one respect by setting a follow-up hearing for Aug. 31. The hearing will allow the accused to return to court if the GPS monitoring requirement proves to interfere with his employment or otherwise affects his livelihood.