Guthmiller asserted that “SCRAM is [a] non-negotiable for this person,” adding, “this is someone who is gonna kill someone on the road.” When they returned, Verma requested that the court order attendance at Alcoholics Anonymous meetings several times per week and random alcohol testing in place of a SCRAM device. Because the accused had only one other DUI within that period, she contended that a SCRAM device was not necessary under the law. Verma’s request for random alcohol testing was also rejected after Guthmiller reminded the court that court rules do not allow pretrial random alcohol testing. Despite the defense’s arguments, the court ordered the installation of a SCRAM device along with weekly Alcoholics Anonymous meetings.