Truth tellers who have nothing to hide tend to speak freely and provide details, whereas lie tellers will deny they attended the event, or will be reluctant to give specifics and may deflect questions. CCA research has shown that truth tellers volunteer more extra information during these successive recalls than lie tellers who keep their stories simple. Their analyses showed that truth tellers were more eloquent and passionate in responding to the eliciting-opinion than to the devil’s advocate request. Lie tellers, however, showed a similar level of eloquence and passion in responding to these two requests, and demonstrated more consistency than truth tellers when comparing eliciting-opinion and devil’s advocate responses. This is consistent with earlier evidence suggesting that lie tellers believe that inconsistency raises suspicions.