“When I saw that the establishment Act was not really an authentic Act, I knew it was not original,” she said. However, she initially declined to conclusively describe the appointment letter as fake, explaining that it was printed on State House letterhead and that she was not a forensic expert. According to him, the signatures on those correspondences were consistent, while the signature on the purported appointment letter was completely different. According to him, none of those features appeared on the purported Act presented to government officials. He said the committee had established that the appointment letter was fake and that the purported establishment Act was forged.