This case presents a FACA challenge to the Religious Liberty Commission (the "RLC" or the "Commission"), an advisory committee established last year by President Donald J. Trump. As such, the statute leaves unanswered three sets of questions regarding whether a committee is appropriately balanced. First, "even before the points of view on an advisory committee can be balanced at all," one must ask: "which points of view should be balanced[?]" …[C.] Plaintiffs fault the RLC for "not represent[ing] religious communities aside from Christianity and Judaism," which Plaintiffs attribute to President Trump's "Judeo-Christian framework." Moreover, Plaintiffs do not allege facts showing that the RLC members are imbalanced in their perspective on the regulation of religious exercise.