None
EN
‘System failed to deliver’: Allahabad High Court flags 50,000 pending police reports
['Bhupendra Pandey', 'Bhupendra Pandey Is The Resident Editor Of The Lucknow Edition Of The Indian Express. With Decades Of Experience In The Heart Of Uttar Pradesh S Journalistic Landscape', 'He Oversees The Bureau S Coverage Of India S Most Politically Significant State. His Expertise Lies In Navigating The Complex Intersections Of State Governance', 'Legislative Policy', 'Grassroots Social Movements. Tracking High-Stakes Assembly Elections To Analyzing Administrative Shifts In The Hindi Heartland', "Bhupendra S Reportage Provides A Definitive Lens On The Region'S Evolution. Authoritativeness He Leads A Team Of Seasoned Reporters", 'Investigators', 'Ensuring That The Indian Express', 'Signature', 'Journalism Of Courage']
The Indian Express
The direction came while the bench was hearing a matter in which a police closure report has remained pending for a decision before a Lucknow court for six years.
Noting that 50,000 police closure reports are pending before courts in Lucknow district alone, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court has sought details from all district judges across Uttar Pradesh on the number of such reports pending in their courts, the reasons for the delay, and the steps taken to dispose of them.
The direction came while the bench was hearing a matter in which a police closure report has remained pending for a decision before a Lucknow court for six years.
“It is unfortunate that final reports are kept pending for years for no fault… (by) the parties but because of indifference on the part of the presiding officers… Unfortunately, this is the area where the system has failed to deliver in time,” observed a single bench of Justice Tej Pratap Tiwari in its order dated July 21.