Plaintiffs allege internal directives encouraged agents to maximize arrests, even when individuals were not the subjects of immigration investigations. Plaintiffs also contend that agents routinely used the existence of a single investigative target as a pretext to stop other Latino individuals nearby. Plaintiffs further contend evidence showed officers frequently ignored white-appearing workers while stopping Latino workers performing similar jobs and also detained Latino customers while leaving white-appearing customers alone. She added that the government’s own records expose a pattern of racial profiling that violates some of the Constitution’s most fundamental protections. The suit alleges unconstitutional stop-and-detention practices tied to arbitrary immigration enforcement quotas.