Yet our research shows that calling out an individual’s bias is no more effective than many other non-confrontational forms of allyship. Further, they believe that calling out bias is justified only when a transgression is particularly egregious in the context of their organization. Besides, for those who are not skilled at calling out bias effectively, utilizing non-confrontational approaches might carry the fewest unintended negative side-effects. Will calling out one person's behavior be effective if a particular instance of bias is part of an organization-wide pattern? Allyship should not be considered a binary choice between calling out bias or being silent.