None
EN
It was cheaper to oust Joel Engardio than to elect him, data shows
['Kelly Waldron', 'More Kelly Waldron', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow', 'Class', 'Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus', 'Display Inline', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar', 'Where Img', 'Height Auto Max-Width', 'Vertical-Align Bottom .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar']
Mission Local
Despite raising three times the money of the recallers, last week 63 percent of District 4 voters decided to recall Supervisor Joel Engardio.
“You don’t need millions of dollars to run a district campaign,” said Eric Jaye, a political consultant.
Recall campaign spent 1/4 as much per vote as Engardio didThe anti-recall campaign spent $105.16 per vote, whereas the recall campaign spent just $27.16 per vote.
Almost as many D4 voters supported the recall as supported Prop.
Correction: We’ve updated the campaign finance figures to reflect money spent rather than money raised.
['recall'
'vote'
'data'
'spent'
'money'
'oust'
'campaign'
'joel'
'engardio'
'voters'
'cheaper'
'supported'
'antirecall'
'elect'
'district'
'shows']